The four-page document, published, detailed a range of punishments meted out to national associations during the qualifiers.
The road to the 2026 FIFA World Cup took another twist this week as world football’s governing body released its latest list of disciplinary sanctions, and conspicuously absent was any mention of South Africa, despite ongoing controversy over the eligibility of midfielder Teboho Mokoena.
The four-page document, published, detailed a range of punishments meted out to national associations during the qualifiers. While countries like Qatar, Indonesia, and Argentina appeared on the list, the South African Football Association (SAFA) remained untouched, raising fresh questions about the Mokoena saga and its potential impact on Group C.
The case against South Africa
Nigeria and Benin have both lodged formal protests after South Africa’s 2-0 win over Lesotho in March, arguing that Mokoena should have been suspended for accumulated yellow cards.
The Mamelodi Sundowns midfielder was first cautioned in the 54th minute of South Africa’s 2-1 victory over Benin in November 2023, then again in the 52nd minute during their 3-1 win over Zimbabwe in June 2024.
By FIFA’s own rulebook, that sequence should have ruled him out of the Lesotho clash.
“If players or team officials receive two cautions in one match (in matches decided by penalties) or in two different matches of the competition, they will be automatically suspended from their team’s subsequent match,” the regulations state.
Despite turning out for Equatorial Guinea for over a decade, striker Emilio Nsue was found never to have secured proper clearance to switch allegiance from Spain, where he had represented youth sides. The result: FIFA docked six points, overturning 1-0 wins over Namibia and Liberia into 3-0 technical losses.
That punishment dropped Equatorial Guinea from second place in Group H with 16 points to fifth with 10, dramatically reshaping the standings and boosting Namibia’s qualification hopes. CAS upheld the ruling in May, reinforcing FIFA’s stance on eligibility breaches.
Sanctions elsewhere
The newly released list confirmed a range of other disciplinary measures:
Qatar; received a formal warning on June 4, 2025, for misconduct by players and officials, with no financial penalty attached.
Indonesia; were warned for lapses in order and security at a World Cup qualifier.
In January, Argentina were fined $20,000 and hit with a two-match suspension for a player found guilty of disciplinary breaches, one of the most severe sanctions in the updated report.
None of these cases, however, directly influence Group C; making the omission of South Africa all the more striking.
Nigeria’s watching brief
For Nigeria, the issue could be decisive. The Super Eagles, sitting on 11 points, still have to play both Lesotho and Benin in their final fixtures. Victories there, combined with a potential points deduction for South Africa, could catapult them back into contention, either as group winners or as one of Africa’s best runners-up.
The current runners-up standings are tight: Gabon lead with 19 points, followed by Madagascar and DR Congo (16), and a cluster including Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Namibia and Uganda (15 each). Benin sit on 14, while Nigeria lurk just behind.
For now, silence
Despite the mounting protests, FIFA’s updated sanctions list makes no reference to South Africa. Bafana Bafana remain top of Group C on 17 points, their route to a first World Cup since 2010 still firmly in their own hands.
But with two matchdays to go, and precedent from Equatorial Guinea’s punishment still fresh, the Mokoena affair lingers as a potential thunderclap in Africa’s qualification race.
For Nigeria and Benin, the wait continues. For South Africa, the silence; for now, is golden.
