The lawyer’s group known for its relentless clamour for electoral reform, and an end to all forms of malpractices associated with the electoral process, said Mr. Falana’s position that it was punishment of voters to, was regrettable and a direct endorsement of electoral malpractices and fraud.
“Nigerians are not unaware of the many fraudulent tactic employed by desperate politicians in Nigeria to inflate their votes and grab power without the endorsement of the people. It is therefore hasty conclusion to call votes that might have been fraudulently generated as belonging to any legal voters”, the group noted.
A. A Ugboha, Esg. who made the statement on behalf of the group in Abuja, further called the attention of Mr. Falana to section 163 of the electoral act 2022 which empowers returning officers not to count ballot papers that do not bear INEC’s official marks. “A burden that could only be effectively discharged by adducing compelling evidence that meets the requirements for allowing such ballot papers to count as provided in subsections 2 and 3 of the above provision”, the civil society group added.
“We cannot hide our disappointment that a role model and legal icon in the rank of Mr. Femi Falana, SAN, who called for “substantial justice”, will chose this time, when a matter is still subjudice, to make comments that are capable of derailing the wheel of justice”.
The group further called on Falana and other senior lawyers, and electoral reform advocates, to support the judiciary in its resolve not to allow desperate politicians who have continued to make free, fair and transparent elections that reflects the will of the people impossible, to inherit power and enjoy the proceeds of their crimes.
Recall that a human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, SAN, faulted the verdict by the Kano Governorship Election Petition Tribunal nullifying the victory of Governor Abba Yusuf, says ‘you can’t punish voters for errors of INEC’
Mr Falana said omitting 165,000 votes on the basis of not being stamped was improper.
According to him, the judges shouldn’t have punished the voters for errors committed by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC.
